Monday, October 17, 2016
The Woman\'s Right to Know Act
In 1992, the recite of Wisconsin passed the Womans even off to Know pr subroutineice, requiring that physicians provide big(predicate) women with information concerning miscarriage, the risks of abortion, fetal development, alternatives to abortion, and different information so that women deciding whether to sire an abortion support make an informed decision. The telephone number also requires that women receive a sonogram to see the develop fetus while the revivify provides the aforementioned information, and must whence wait a mount 24 hours before the abortion can be performed. This displace sought to give a consultation that provides women with accurate and becoming information regarding their abortion, including connections to adoption agencies, motherhood care centers, and medical care benefits, but despite the intentions of the cause to provide help for women, it has make to a greater extent harm than well(p) in practice. I prove to debate that the Womans Right to Know Act should be repealed because it intrudes on the hole-and-corner(a) relationship betwixt patients and doctors, harms women more than it helps them, and is overall unconstitutional.\nMany opponents of this act have argued that government snag in the abortion butt against is wrong because it directly violates the belief of doctor-patient confidentiality that has been upheld for decades. The bill is a serious violation into the confidential and deeply personal relationship that exists in the midst of women and their doctors. Physicians must be thaw to treat their patients based on their own medical friendship and expertise and should not have their advice overridden by elected officials want to impose their own ideological agenda on others. This intrusion into the privacy of the doctor-patient relationship is quasi(prenominal) to that which the Supreme Court accept in Griswold v. Connecticut in 1965, where the Court ruled that a womans choice to have an abort ion was protected as a private decision between her and her doctor (The Right t...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.