Explain key differences between the ‘quantitative revolution’, Marxism and the ‘cultural turn’ and assess the way these approaches have influenced geographical research

Explain key differences between the quantitative revolution, Marxism and the pagan turn and assess the bearing these improvementes have influenced geographical inquiry\n\nGeography as a check out had been dominated by kingdomal geography for very much of the first half of the 20th century. Geographers picked out regions to study, and then canvas the physical and cultural processes that make those regions bizarre. A region contains a special, unique, and in some ways uniform combination of kinds or categories of phenomena (Schaefer 1953) and the uniqueness of every region was such that the only abstract that could be made around these regions was that they were unique (Peet 1998).\n\nBut Schaefer was depressing with geography being classified advertisement in this way. He mat that there were regularities between the sexual intercourse unique positions of phenomena, and thus spacial patterns and morphological laws existed (Bennet 1985). This led to the induce of th e quantitative revolution, where geographers pore their studies in researching these patterns and laws, and sought to rationalise them using science.\n\nJohn marshall argues that geography had always been a science by sexual abstention of the fact it is a truth-seeking discipline whose raw materials consist of empiric observations (Marshall 1985). When the revolution began in the 1950s, examples already existed of empirical observations being use to explain phenomena in kind geography. Christaller used mathematical models in his central place guess (1933) to explain the way masses laid out the dwell landscape because he had detect that similarly sized settlements were equidistant from each new(prenominal). An example of such a study from the m of the revolution would be MacArthur and Wilsons Theory of Island Biogeography (1969) which seeks to explain how islands and other habitat islands are colonise by flora and fauna. It is establish on the observation that islands f ar-off from the mainland usually have various and sometimes completely unique biogeographies, and the authors use some very complex mathematical equations to award how this phenomenon occurs.\n\nMany people were in time very critical of this show up to geography, typeicularly the positivist (scientific) locating to it. The critics arguments are based on the fact that the positivist approach was supposed to be valuate free, but as pitying geography is a loving science, and the geographers doing the research are part of society, they have their own set which unavoidably influence their studies (Cloke et al 1991). Another criticism came from Gould (1970) who argued that, with the exception...If you exigency to get a full phase of the moon essay, order it on our website:

Buy Essay NOW and get 15% DISCOUNT for first order. Only Best Essay Writers and excellent support 24/7!